Review



rabbit polyclonal antibodies against myc  (Proteintech)


Bioz Verified Symbol Proteintech is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 96
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Proteintech rabbit polyclonal antibodies against myc
    Rabbit Polyclonal Antibodies Against Myc, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 978 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+myc+tag+polyclonal+antibody/MYC+tag+Antibody/pmc13022623-279-26-32
    Average 96 stars, based on 978 article reviews
    rabbit polyclonal antibodies against myc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    Expressing:

    Article Title: N460S in PB2 and I163T in nucleoprotein synergistically enhance the viral replication and pathogenicity of influenza B virus.
    Article Snippet: Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto PVDF membranes (Millipore). .. Protein expression was detected using rabbit anti-NP polyclonal antibody (Cat. No. 40438-T62, Sino Biological) or rabbit anti-Myc tag polyclonal antibody (Cat. No. 16286–1-AP, Proteintech), followed by HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology). .. Signals were visualized using an ECL detection kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

    Article Title: N460S in PB2 and I163T in nucleoprotein synergistically enhance the viral replication and pathogenicity of influenza B virus
    Article Snippet: Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto PVDF membranes (Millipore). .. Protein expression was detected using rabbit anti-NP polyclonal antibody (Cat. No. 40438-T62, Sino Biological) or rabbit anti-Myc tag polyclonal antibody (Cat. No. 16286–1-AP, Proteintech), followed by HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology). .. Signals were visualized using an ECL detection kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific).



    Similar Products

    rabbit polyclonal anti myc tag  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)
    96
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit polyclonal anti myc tag
    Nuclear actin-YAP binding plays a pivotal role in cell proliferation. ( A–B ) AlphaFold 3 prediction model of TEAD4 (magenta) interaction with (A) YAP (cyan) or (B) YAP (cyan) and G-actin (green) in the presence of M-CAT DNA. The black box indicated the predicted four-chain α-helical interface (4α) interacts with TEAD4 DNA binding domain (DBD). ( C ) Immunoblot analysis of Lysate and IP fractions from GFP-trap co-immunoprecipitation experiment in HeLa wt cells or HeLa cells stably expressing FLAG-3X NLS-EGFP-YAP WT and transiently transfected with FLAG-NLS-actin and myc-TEAD4. ( D ) ChIP-qPCR analysis of YAP–TEAD4 recruitment to target genes in HeLa cells transfected with NLS-EGFP (pink, triangle), NLS-EGFP-YAP WT (blue, circle) and NLS-EGFP-YAP DDY (green, square). ZFP37 served as a negative control. Data are from three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was done using a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test ( P < 0.05, P < 0.01). ( E ) Quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis of YAP target gene expression in HeLa cells transfected with NLS-BFP (Mock) or NLS-actin in the absence or presence of myc-YAP WT or myc-YAP DDY . Data are normalized to the NLS-BFP Mock control mRNA transcripts. Each dot represents an independent experiment. Statistical analysis was done using One-way ANOVA with Tukey´s multiple comparison test ( P < 0.05, P < 0.01, P < 0.0001). ( F ) Dose response curves of purified YAP WT (blue) and YAP DDY (green) over TEAD4-coated CM5 chip, indicating the dissociation constant (K d ). ( G ) Representative images of Click-iT® Plus EdU assay of HeLa cells transfected with empty plasmid (Mock), myc-YAP WT and myc -YAP DDY and stained <t>for</t> <t>anti-myc</t> (green), DAPI (blue) and EdU (magenta). Images are shown as MIPs, Scale bar = 20 μm. ( H ) Quantification of the ratio of EdU + cells. Data are shown as a violin plot with median, quartiles and individual data points from three independent biological replicates (green, magenta, cyan). Each dot represents the percentage of EdU + cells per field of view. Statistical analysis was done using One-way ANOVA with Tukey´s multiple comparison test ( P < 0.0001). n = 26, 24, and 24.
    Rabbit Polyclonal Anti Myc Tag, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+myc+tag+polyclonal+antibody/Myc-Tag+Antibody/pmc13000468-163-24-29
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit polyclonal anti myc tag - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    rabbit polyclonal antibodies against myc  (Proteintech)
    96
    Proteintech rabbit polyclonal antibodies against myc
    Nuclear actin-YAP binding plays a pivotal role in cell proliferation. ( A–B ) AlphaFold 3 prediction model of TEAD4 (magenta) interaction with (A) YAP (cyan) or (B) YAP (cyan) and G-actin (green) in the presence of M-CAT DNA. The black box indicated the predicted four-chain α-helical interface (4α) interacts with TEAD4 DNA binding domain (DBD). ( C ) Immunoblot analysis of Lysate and IP fractions from GFP-trap co-immunoprecipitation experiment in HeLa wt cells or HeLa cells stably expressing FLAG-3X NLS-EGFP-YAP WT and transiently transfected with FLAG-NLS-actin and myc-TEAD4. ( D ) ChIP-qPCR analysis of YAP–TEAD4 recruitment to target genes in HeLa cells transfected with NLS-EGFP (pink, triangle), NLS-EGFP-YAP WT (blue, circle) and NLS-EGFP-YAP DDY (green, square). ZFP37 served as a negative control. Data are from three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was done using a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test ( P < 0.05, P < 0.01). ( E ) Quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis of YAP target gene expression in HeLa cells transfected with NLS-BFP (Mock) or NLS-actin in the absence or presence of myc-YAP WT or myc-YAP DDY . Data are normalized to the NLS-BFP Mock control mRNA transcripts. Each dot represents an independent experiment. Statistical analysis was done using One-way ANOVA with Tukey´s multiple comparison test ( P < 0.05, P < 0.01, P < 0.0001). ( F ) Dose response curves of purified YAP WT (blue) and YAP DDY (green) over TEAD4-coated CM5 chip, indicating the dissociation constant (K d ). ( G ) Representative images of Click-iT® Plus EdU assay of HeLa cells transfected with empty plasmid (Mock), myc-YAP WT and myc -YAP DDY and stained <t>for</t> <t>anti-myc</t> (green), DAPI (blue) and EdU (magenta). Images are shown as MIPs, Scale bar = 20 μm. ( H ) Quantification of the ratio of EdU + cells. Data are shown as a violin plot with median, quartiles and individual data points from three independent biological replicates (green, magenta, cyan). Each dot represents the percentage of EdU + cells per field of view. Statistical analysis was done using One-way ANOVA with Tukey´s multiple comparison test ( P < 0.0001). n = 26, 24, and 24.
    Rabbit Polyclonal Antibodies Against Myc, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+myc+tag+polyclonal+antibody/MYC+tag+Antibody/pmc13022623-279-26-32
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit polyclonal antibodies against myc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    resource source identifier antibodies anti myc tag rabbit polyclonal antibody abbkine  (Abbkine Inc)
    86
    Abbkine Inc resource source identifier antibodies anti myc tag rabbit polyclonal antibody abbkine
    Nuclear actin-YAP binding plays a pivotal role in cell proliferation. ( A–B ) AlphaFold 3 prediction model of TEAD4 (magenta) interaction with (A) YAP (cyan) or (B) YAP (cyan) and G-actin (green) in the presence of M-CAT DNA. The black box indicated the predicted four-chain α-helical interface (4α) interacts with TEAD4 DNA binding domain (DBD). ( C ) Immunoblot analysis of Lysate and IP fractions from GFP-trap co-immunoprecipitation experiment in HeLa wt cells or HeLa cells stably expressing FLAG-3X NLS-EGFP-YAP WT and transiently transfected with FLAG-NLS-actin and myc-TEAD4. ( D ) ChIP-qPCR analysis of YAP–TEAD4 recruitment to target genes in HeLa cells transfected with NLS-EGFP (pink, triangle), NLS-EGFP-YAP WT (blue, circle) and NLS-EGFP-YAP DDY (green, square). ZFP37 served as a negative control. Data are from three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was done using a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test ( P < 0.05, P < 0.01). ( E ) Quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis of YAP target gene expression in HeLa cells transfected with NLS-BFP (Mock) or NLS-actin in the absence or presence of myc-YAP WT or myc-YAP DDY . Data are normalized to the NLS-BFP Mock control mRNA transcripts. Each dot represents an independent experiment. Statistical analysis was done using One-way ANOVA with Tukey´s multiple comparison test ( P < 0.05, P < 0.01, P < 0.0001). ( F ) Dose response curves of purified YAP WT (blue) and YAP DDY (green) over TEAD4-coated CM5 chip, indicating the dissociation constant (K d ). ( G ) Representative images of Click-iT® Plus EdU assay of HeLa cells transfected with empty plasmid (Mock), myc-YAP WT and myc -YAP DDY and stained <t>for</t> <t>anti-myc</t> (green), DAPI (blue) and EdU (magenta). Images are shown as MIPs, Scale bar = 20 μm. ( H ) Quantification of the ratio of EdU + cells. Data are shown as a violin plot with median, quartiles and individual data points from three independent biological replicates (green, magenta, cyan). Each dot represents the percentage of EdU + cells per field of view. Statistical analysis was done using One-way ANOVA with Tukey´s multiple comparison test ( P < 0.0001). n = 26, 24, and 24.
    Resource Source Identifier Antibodies Anti Myc Tag Rabbit Polyclonal Antibody Abbkine, supplied by Abbkine Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+myc+tag+polyclonal+antibody/anti+his/pm41638214-252-2-11
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    resource source identifier antibodies anti myc tag rabbit polyclonal antibody abbkine - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    source myc tag rabbit polyclonal ab  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)
    86
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc source myc tag rabbit polyclonal ab
    Nuclear actin-YAP binding plays a pivotal role in cell proliferation. ( A–B ) AlphaFold 3 prediction model of TEAD4 (magenta) interaction with (A) YAP (cyan) or (B) YAP (cyan) and G-actin (green) in the presence of M-CAT DNA. The black box indicated the predicted four-chain α-helical interface (4α) interacts with TEAD4 DNA binding domain (DBD). ( C ) Immunoblot analysis of Lysate and IP fractions from GFP-trap co-immunoprecipitation experiment in HeLa wt cells or HeLa cells stably expressing FLAG-3X NLS-EGFP-YAP WT and transiently transfected with FLAG-NLS-actin and myc-TEAD4. ( D ) ChIP-qPCR analysis of YAP–TEAD4 recruitment to target genes in HeLa cells transfected with NLS-EGFP (pink, triangle), NLS-EGFP-YAP WT (blue, circle) and NLS-EGFP-YAP DDY (green, square). ZFP37 served as a negative control. Data are from three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was done using a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test ( P < 0.05, P < 0.01). ( E ) Quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis of YAP target gene expression in HeLa cells transfected with NLS-BFP (Mock) or NLS-actin in the absence or presence of myc-YAP WT or myc-YAP DDY . Data are normalized to the NLS-BFP Mock control mRNA transcripts. Each dot represents an independent experiment. Statistical analysis was done using One-way ANOVA with Tukey´s multiple comparison test ( P < 0.05, P < 0.01, P < 0.0001). ( F ) Dose response curves of purified YAP WT (blue) and YAP DDY (green) over TEAD4-coated CM5 chip, indicating the dissociation constant (K d ). ( G ) Representative images of Click-iT® Plus EdU assay of HeLa cells transfected with empty plasmid (Mock), myc-YAP WT and myc -YAP DDY and stained <t>for</t> <t>anti-myc</t> (green), DAPI (blue) and EdU (magenta). Images are shown as MIPs, Scale bar = 20 μm. ( H ) Quantification of the ratio of EdU + cells. Data are shown as a violin plot with median, quartiles and individual data points from three independent biological replicates (green, magenta, cyan). Each dot represents the percentage of EdU + cells per field of view. Statistical analysis was done using One-way ANOVA with Tukey´s multiple comparison test ( P < 0.0001). n = 26, 24, and 24.
    Source Myc Tag Rabbit Polyclonal Ab, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+myc+tag+polyclonal+antibody/pm41519889-308-9-15
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    source myc tag rabbit polyclonal ab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    myc tag rabbit polyclonal ab  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)
    86
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc myc tag rabbit polyclonal ab
    Nuclear actin-YAP binding plays a pivotal role in cell proliferation. ( A–B ) AlphaFold 3 prediction model of TEAD4 (magenta) interaction with (A) YAP (cyan) or (B) YAP (cyan) and G-actin (green) in the presence of M-CAT DNA. The black box indicated the predicted four-chain α-helical interface (4α) interacts with TEAD4 DNA binding domain (DBD). ( C ) Immunoblot analysis of Lysate and IP fractions from GFP-trap co-immunoprecipitation experiment in HeLa wt cells or HeLa cells stably expressing FLAG-3X NLS-EGFP-YAP WT and transiently transfected with FLAG-NLS-actin and myc-TEAD4. ( D ) ChIP-qPCR analysis of YAP–TEAD4 recruitment to target genes in HeLa cells transfected with NLS-EGFP (pink, triangle), NLS-EGFP-YAP WT (blue, circle) and NLS-EGFP-YAP DDY (green, square). ZFP37 served as a negative control. Data are from three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was done using a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test ( P < 0.05, P < 0.01). ( E ) Quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis of YAP target gene expression in HeLa cells transfected with NLS-BFP (Mock) or NLS-actin in the absence or presence of myc-YAP WT or myc-YAP DDY . Data are normalized to the NLS-BFP Mock control mRNA transcripts. Each dot represents an independent experiment. Statistical analysis was done using One-way ANOVA with Tukey´s multiple comparison test ( P < 0.05, P < 0.01, P < 0.0001). ( F ) Dose response curves of purified YAP WT (blue) and YAP DDY (green) over TEAD4-coated CM5 chip, indicating the dissociation constant (K d ). ( G ) Representative images of Click-iT® Plus EdU assay of HeLa cells transfected with empty plasmid (Mock), myc-YAP WT and myc -YAP DDY and stained <t>for</t> <t>anti-myc</t> (green), DAPI (blue) and EdU (magenta). Images are shown as MIPs, Scale bar = 20 μm. ( H ) Quantification of the ratio of EdU + cells. Data are shown as a violin plot with median, quartiles and individual data points from three independent biological replicates (green, magenta, cyan). Each dot represents the percentage of EdU + cells per field of view. Statistical analysis was done using One-way ANOVA with Tukey´s multiple comparison test ( P < 0.0001). n = 26, 24, and 24.
    Myc Tag Rabbit Polyclonal Ab, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+myc+tag+polyclonal+antibody/pmc12905138-4-0-7
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    myc tag rabbit polyclonal ab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Nuclear actin-YAP binding plays a pivotal role in cell proliferation. ( A–B ) AlphaFold 3 prediction model of TEAD4 (magenta) interaction with (A) YAP (cyan) or (B) YAP (cyan) and G-actin (green) in the presence of M-CAT DNA. The black box indicated the predicted four-chain α-helical interface (4α) interacts with TEAD4 DNA binding domain (DBD). ( C ) Immunoblot analysis of Lysate and IP fractions from GFP-trap co-immunoprecipitation experiment in HeLa wt cells or HeLa cells stably expressing FLAG-3X NLS-EGFP-YAP WT and transiently transfected with FLAG-NLS-actin and myc-TEAD4. ( D ) ChIP-qPCR analysis of YAP–TEAD4 recruitment to target genes in HeLa cells transfected with NLS-EGFP (pink, triangle), NLS-EGFP-YAP WT (blue, circle) and NLS-EGFP-YAP DDY (green, square). ZFP37 served as a negative control. Data are from three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was done using a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test ( P < 0.05, P < 0.01). ( E ) Quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis of YAP target gene expression in HeLa cells transfected with NLS-BFP (Mock) or NLS-actin in the absence or presence of myc-YAP WT or myc-YAP DDY . Data are normalized to the NLS-BFP Mock control mRNA transcripts. Each dot represents an independent experiment. Statistical analysis was done using One-way ANOVA with Tukey´s multiple comparison test ( P < 0.05, P < 0.01, P < 0.0001). ( F ) Dose response curves of purified YAP WT (blue) and YAP DDY (green) over TEAD4-coated CM5 chip, indicating the dissociation constant (K d ). ( G ) Representative images of Click-iT® Plus EdU assay of HeLa cells transfected with empty plasmid (Mock), myc-YAP WT and myc -YAP DDY and stained for anti-myc (green), DAPI (blue) and EdU (magenta). Images are shown as MIPs, Scale bar = 20 μm. ( H ) Quantification of the ratio of EdU + cells. Data are shown as a violin plot with median, quartiles and individual data points from three independent biological replicates (green, magenta, cyan). Each dot represents the percentage of EdU + cells per field of view. Statistical analysis was done using One-way ANOVA with Tukey´s multiple comparison test ( P < 0.0001). n = 26, 24, and 24.

    Journal: Nucleic Acids Research

    Article Title: Regulation of YAP activity by nuclear G-actin binding

    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkag248

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Nuclear actin-YAP binding plays a pivotal role in cell proliferation. ( A–B ) AlphaFold 3 prediction model of TEAD4 (magenta) interaction with (A) YAP (cyan) or (B) YAP (cyan) and G-actin (green) in the presence of M-CAT DNA. The black box indicated the predicted four-chain α-helical interface (4α) interacts with TEAD4 DNA binding domain (DBD). ( C ) Immunoblot analysis of Lysate and IP fractions from GFP-trap co-immunoprecipitation experiment in HeLa wt cells or HeLa cells stably expressing FLAG-3X NLS-EGFP-YAP WT and transiently transfected with FLAG-NLS-actin and myc-TEAD4. ( D ) ChIP-qPCR analysis of YAP–TEAD4 recruitment to target genes in HeLa cells transfected with NLS-EGFP (pink, triangle), NLS-EGFP-YAP WT (blue, circle) and NLS-EGFP-YAP DDY (green, square). ZFP37 served as a negative control. Data are from three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was done using a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test ( P < 0.05, P < 0.01). ( E ) Quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis of YAP target gene expression in HeLa cells transfected with NLS-BFP (Mock) or NLS-actin in the absence or presence of myc-YAP WT or myc-YAP DDY . Data are normalized to the NLS-BFP Mock control mRNA transcripts. Each dot represents an independent experiment. Statistical analysis was done using One-way ANOVA with Tukey´s multiple comparison test ( P < 0.05, P < 0.01, P < 0.0001). ( F ) Dose response curves of purified YAP WT (blue) and YAP DDY (green) over TEAD4-coated CM5 chip, indicating the dissociation constant (K d ). ( G ) Representative images of Click-iT® Plus EdU assay of HeLa cells transfected with empty plasmid (Mock), myc-YAP WT and myc -YAP DDY and stained for anti-myc (green), DAPI (blue) and EdU (magenta). Images are shown as MIPs, Scale bar = 20 μm. ( H ) Quantification of the ratio of EdU + cells. Data are shown as a violin plot with median, quartiles and individual data points from three independent biological replicates (green, magenta, cyan). Each dot represents the percentage of EdU + cells per field of view. Statistical analysis was done using One-way ANOVA with Tukey´s multiple comparison test ( P < 0.0001). n = 26, 24, and 24.

    Article Snippet: The following primary were used: mouse monoclonal anti-FLAG® M2 antibody (1:1000, Merck, F1804), YAP (D8H1X) XP® Rabbit mAb (1:500, Cell Signaling Technology, 14 074), rabbit polyclonal anti-Myc Tag (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, 2272), mCherry (E5D8F) Rabbit mAb (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, 43 590), anti-Tubulin (11H10) Rabbit mAb (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, 2125), mouse monoclonal anti-Actin antibody (Merck, A4700), eGFP mouse monoclonal antibody (F56-6A1.2.3) (1:1000, Invitrogen, MA1-952), anti-GAPDH mouse mAb (6C5) (1:2000, Millipore, CB1001).

    Techniques: Binding Assay, Western Blot, Immunoprecipitation, Stable Transfection, Expressing, Transfection, ChIP-qPCR, Negative Control, Two Tailed Test, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Targeted Gene Expression, Control, Comparison, Purification, EdU Assay, Plasmid Preparation, Staining